Skip to content

Electrical Panel Upgrade vs. Part Retrofit: Strategies for Multi-Family Property Managers

  • by
Large building.

Introduction

For commercial property managers overseeing multi-family complexes, the task of ensuring buildings remain insurable, compliant, and safe for transactions is fraught with challenges. This is particularly true when dealing with outdated electrical systems outfitted with components notorious for their safety risks, such as Zinsco and Federal Pacific Electric (FPE) panels, along with other problematic parts like Zinsco breakers, bus bars, and Pushmatic Bulldog panels. A pressing issue emerges: Is it feasible to replace only the high-risk elements, like breakers and bus bars, with third-party manufactured alternatives deemed safer, and will such partial upgrades meet the stringent requirements of insurance providers?

This question underscores a significant financial consideration: the substantial expense involved in overhauling complete electrical panel systems in properties that may house over a hundred units, compared to the seemingly cost-effective approach of retrofitting only the components identified as hazardous.

Property managers are thus placed at a crossroads, weighing the potential for cost savings through targeted retrofits against the comprehensive solution of full panel upgrades, each option bearing its implications for insurance coverage, regulatory compliance, and property value.

General Risk


Despite the notorious safety concerns associated with Federal Pacific and Zinsco electrical panels, it’s important to clarify that these panels and their components are not illegal at this time. Both Federal Pacific and Zinsco were implicated in a class-action lawsuit in 2002 due to significant safety issues identified with their products. However, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) concluded its investigation into Federal Pacific Electric (FPE) circuit breakers in 1983 without definitively resolving the question of their safety or fully endorsing the manufacturer’s claims. The CPSC’s decision to close the matter without a clear determination has been widely criticized, leaving a gap in regulatory enforcement.

Despite the absence of explicit legal prohibitions against these panels, the de facto regulatory role has been assumed by insurance companies. These insurers, wary of the potential risks, are increasingly hesitant to provide coverage for properties equipped with these panels, effectively pushing for their replacement. As California advances its agenda for modern, green electrification, there’s speculation that formal regulations mandating the removal or upgrade of such electrical panels could emerge from Sacramento. This potential shift would align with broader safety and environmental objectives, making it prudent for property managers to proactively address these electrical panel concerns in anticipation of possible future mandates.

A crucial aspect of the decision-making process is the potential for mandatory removal of high-risk electrical panels. With certain jurisdictions, like Napa, already imposing such requirements, the trend could extend to other areas, compelling property managers to undertake full panel replacements eventually. Assessing the likelihood of such mandates becoming more widespread is essential. While waiting it out might seem like a viable strategy, the risk of future forced upgrades under tighter timelines and possibly higher costs argues for proactive action.

In weighing the options between electrical panel upgrades and part retrofitting, property managers must consider the unique circumstances of their properties, including long-term ownership plans, immediate financial constraints, and evolving regulatory landscapes. Engaging with insurance carriers to understand their positions on retrofits, consulting with electrical safety experts, and considering the broader implications of partial vs. complete upgrades will guide property managers toward decisions that align with their strategic goals, ensuring their properties remain safe, insurable, and compliant with current and future standards.

Timescale Based Considerations

Case 1: Retrofitting for Long-term Hold

If you’re planning to hold onto the property for an extended period, retrofitting risky components with safer, third-party parts might be a viable strategy, especially if your current insurance provider is amenable to this solution. The key advantage here is cost efficiency, as part retrofitting can be significantly less expensive than a complete panel overhaul. Should your insurer agree to continue coverage based on these updates, you can maintain insurance protection while minimizing upfront investment. This approach, however, presumes a stable relationship with your insurer and confidence that regulatory landscapes won’t shift dramatically to require full replacements in the near future.

Case 2: Full Replacement for an Imminent Sale

In contrast, if your strategy involves selling the property shortly, opting for a full electrical panel upgrade is the safer route. This consideration stems from the uncertainty surrounding the buyer’s, their broker’s, and particularly their insurer’s acceptance of partial retrofits. Even if your insurance company has approved the retrofit solution, there’s no guarantee the buyer’s insurance provider will uphold this decision. A full upgrade eliminates any ambiguity, presenting a fully compliant property to potential buyers and their affiliates. This not only enhances the property’s marketability but also streamlines the sale process by preempting possible objections over electrical safety and compliance.

Cost Considerations



Panel Retrofit Cost Range: Retrofitting an electrical panel, which involves replacing specific components like breakers or bus bars with safer, third-party manufactured parts, is generally less expensive than a full panel replacement. The cost for a retrofit can range from a few hundred to a couple of thousand dollars, depending on the complexity of the work and the parts required. For instance, replacing individual breakers might cost between $30 to $150 per breaker, plus labor. The total cost for retrofitting parts could, therefore, range from approximately $500 to $2,000, taking into account the variability of parts and labor.

Panel Upgrade Cost Range: Upgrading an electrical panel, on the other hand, involves removing the old panel and installing a new one that meets current electrical codes and safety standards. This process can be more labor-intensive and may require additional work, such as rewiring or adjusting the panel location to comply with modern electrical codes. The cost for a full panel upgrade can range from $2,000 to $4,000 or more for standard residential properties. For multi-family or commercial properties, where multiple panels might need to be upgraded across several units, the costs can escalate significantly, potentially reaching tens of thousands of dollars depending on the number of units, the complexity of the installation, and the need for any associated electrical system upgrades.

Do You Need to Make a Decision Now


Yes, the decision to upgrade outdated electrical panels and/or breakers and tubes should be made without delay. The combination of increased electrical demand, hidden hazards, insurance and liability challenges, and the potential for escalating costs creates a compelling case for immediate action. Upgrading electrical panels is not merely a regulatory compliance issue but a critical investment in property safety, insurability, and long-term value.

For property managers, the path forward involves coordinating with HOAs, residents, and electrical professionals to ensure a smooth and efficient upgrade process. Addressing this issue proactively not only safeguards against potential disasters but also positions the property favorably in an increasingly safety-conscious and regulated environment. Failure to take action quickly may result in the following escalated issues:

  1. Elevated Risks with Zinsco Panels in Dense Living Environments Multi-family residences and commercial buildings require robust electrical infrastructure due to the high density of occupants and modern electrical demands. Zinsco panels, products of an era before the widespread use of electronics like computers and smart home devices, struggle under today’s electrical loads. This discrepancy between design capacity and current demands highlights the risk of overloading and overheating, potentially leading to catastrophic failures. The necessity for upgrades is clear, driven by the integration of modern technologies and the collective needs of communities. Leading the charge, Homeowners’ Associations (HOA) often spearhead the transition, navigating the complexities of upgrading for enhanced safety and compliance, despite the challenges of coordinating such extensive projects.
  1. The Challenge in Identifying Compromised Panels The insidious nature of damage to Zinsco panels means that issues are not immediately apparent upon casual inspection. These panels may seem operational while concealing critical faults that prevent them from tripping in overload conditions, posing serious risks of fires and electrical shocks. The complexity of electrical systems in large residential complexes, with a mix of individual and communal panels, complicates the detection of early signs of failure. Without vigilant monitoring and reporting from residents, these initial signs may go unnoticed, allowing risks to escalate unnoticed.
  2. Insurance Implications for Properties with Zinsco Panels Insurance companies, wary of the heightened risks associated with properties outfitted with Zinsco electrical systems, exercise increased diligence in their coverage decisions. The notorious history of Zinsco panels concerning electrical safety makes securing affordable insurance coverage a formidable task for property managers. This situation underscores the importance of proactive electrical system management to mitigate liability and ensure the safety of all residents.
  3. Procrastination Amplifies Risks and Costs As technology advances and the demand for electricity in residential settings grows, the importance of updating outdated electrical infrastructure cannot be overstated. HOAs recognizing the urgency are taking proactive steps to modernize electrical panels, a process that requires detailed planning and clear communication about the benefits and necessity of such upgrades. Delaying these updates not only exacerbates the risk of system failures but also leads to increased costs for labor, parts, and insurance over time, stressing the need for timely action to safeguard properties and their occupants.

What Our Clients Say

They were fabulous with their work and communication. We used them on a commercial project for our electronic lockers and it went very smoothly. Thanks so much!

Jacob M.

I am very impressed with Tom and his crew. They’re responsive, reliable, and do top quality work.

Jeff P.

We hired Momentum to help with installing an electric wall oven. These guys are remarkably professional; and they take customer satisfaction very seriously.

Ki V.

Momentum offered a reasonable price, accommodated our tight timing and executed the project seamlessly. The project had many unexpected issues and they solved all of them in a short period of time.

Dan S.

Momentum’s work was done efficiently and professionally at a reasonable price. Will definitely use them for future projects if anything comes up.

Stephanie M.

Highly recommend!! Exceptional service and price. Tom was very helpful, a really nice straight forward guy who definitely cares about his clients.

Amy R.